Pension Schemes Bill — Clause 11 — Detailed Annual Reporting of Costs Incurred by Certain Occupational Pension Schemes — 29 Mar 2017 at 17:18
Charles Walker MP, Broxbourne voted against requiring detailed annual reporting of costs incurred by certain occupational pension schemes.
The majority of MPs voted against requiring detailed annual reporting of costs incurred by certain occupational pension schemes.
The proposed amendment rejected in this vote was:
- Amendment proposed: 1, page 8, line 13, at end insert—
- “( ) A minimum requirement of annual reporting of administration, fund management costs and transaction costs for each asset class, drawdown product and for active and passive asset management strategies.”
The rejected amendment was accompanied by the following explanatory note:
- This amendment would introduce annual reporting and inclusion of transaction costs requirements for Master Trusts.
Had it not been rejected the amendment would have added a subclause to clause 11 of the Bill[2] which set out what may be included in regulations made relating to the running of certain pension schemes.
The motion rejected in this vote was:
- That the amendment be made.
==
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 281 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 85.8% |
DUP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 62.5% |
Lab | 0 | 175 (+2 tell) | 0 | 77.0% |
LDem | 0 | 6 | 0 | 66.7% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
UUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 286 | 188 | 0 | 81.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |