European Union (Withdrawal) Bill — New Clause 44 — Independent Evaluation — Health and Social Care — 20 Dec 2017 at 21:22
John Baron MP, Basildon and Billericay voted not to require an independent evaluation of the impact of this the European Union Withdrawal Act on the health and social care sector.
The majority of MPs voted not to require an independent evaluation of the impact of this the European Union Withdrawal Act on the health and social care sector.
MPs were considering the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Duty to make arrangements for an independent evaluation: health and social care and began:
- ‘(1) No later than 1 year after this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must make arrangements for the independent evaluation of the impact of this Act on the health and social care sector.
the proposed new clause went on to set out details of the requirements for the evaluation and its publication.
The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following explanatory notice:
- This new clause would require an independent evaluation of the impact of the Act upon the health and social care sector to be made after consulting the Scottish Ministers, the Welsh Ministers and the relevant Northern Ireland department, service providers, those requiring health and social care services, and others.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||308 (+2 tell)||0||0||97.8%|
|SNP||0||31 (+2 tell)||0||94.3%|