Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 16 — 20 Jun 2023 at 17:45
Moved by Lord Vaux of Harrowden
16: Clause 46, page 36, line 14, at end insert-“113BA Required information about members: nomineesThe required information about a member includes a statement by the individual, or where the member is a body corporate, or a firm that is a legal person under the law by which it is governed, by an officer of that body corporate or firm, as to whether or not they are holding the shares on behalf of, or subject to the direction of, another person or persons, and if they are-(a) where any such person is an individual, the information required by section 113A in relation to that individual;(b) where any such person is a body corporate or firm that is a legal person under the law by which it is governed, the information required by section 113B in relation to that body corporate or firm.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would require a person or firm holding shares as a nominee to declare whether or not that is the case, and to provide the details of the person or persons on whose behalf, or under whose control the shares are held. This would assist the company in identifying Persons of Significant Control, and would introduce an offence for a nominee who did not declare themselves as such.
Ayes 218, Noes 175.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 4 | 168 (+2 tell) | 62.6% |
| Crossbench | 26 (+1 tell) | 3 | 17.1% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 3 | 0 | 30.0% |
| Lab | 105 (+1 tell) | 0 | 59.2% |
| LDem | 63 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Non-affiliated | 11 | 2 | 22.8% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 216 | 173 | 49.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Agnew of Oulton | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Balfe | Con | aye |
| Lord Clarke of Nottingham | Con | aye |
| Lord Garnier | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Chartres | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Earl Peel | Crossbench | no |
| Viscount Waverley | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |