Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 33 — 6 Mar 2024 at 16:15

Moved by Baroness Chakrabarti

33: Leave out Clause 4 and insert the following new Clause-“Decisions in individual claims(1) Section 2 does not prevent-(a) the Secretary of State or an immigration officer from deciding (under any applicable provision of, or made under, the Immigration Acts) whether the Republic of Rwanda is a safe country for the person in question or for a group of persons to which that person belongs; or(b) a court or tribunal considering a review of, or an appeal against, a relevant decision to the extent that the review or appeal is brought on the grounds that the Republic of Rwanda is not a safe country for the person in question or for a group of persons to which that person belongs; or(c) a decision-maker considering whether there is a real risk that the Republic of Rwanda will remove or send the person in question to another State in contravention of any of its international obligations.(2) The court or tribunal may grant an interim remedy that prevents or delays, or that has the effect of preventing or delaying, the removal of the person to the Republic of Rwanda. (3) Section 54 of the Illegal Migration Act 2023 is disapplied for the purposes of this Act.(4) In this section-“interim remedy” means any interim remedy or relief however described (including, in particular, an interim injunction or interdict);“relevant decision” means a decision taken by the Secretary of State or an immigration officer (under any applicable provision of, or made under, the Immigration Acts) that the Republic of Rwanda is a safe country for the person in question.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment restores the ability of the Secretary of State, immigration officers, courts, and tribunals, to consider whether the Republic of Rwanda is a safe country and jurisdiction of domestic courts and tribunals to grant interim relief.

Ayes 278, Noes 189.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop6 024.0%
Con5 165 (+2 tell)60.1%
Crossbench58 1039.5%
DUP0 466.7%
Green1 050.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge4 044.4%
Lab118 (+2 tell) 069.8%
LDem69 085.2%
Non-affiliated13 735.7%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:276 18757.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Clarke of NottinghamConaye
Lord Deben Conaye
Baroness Fairhead Conaye
Viscount Hailsham Conaye
Lord Tugendhat Conaye
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carrington Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Chartres Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of Cork and OrreryCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbenchno
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ravensdale Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thurlow Crossbenchno
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Fowler Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Truscott Non-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive