Voting Record — Yasmin Qureshi MP, Bolton South East (24775)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Lab||5 votes out of 477, 1.0%||477 votes out of 776, 61.5%||3 times|
- See Yasmin Qureshi's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Yasmin Qureshi||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||5 Nov 2012||Business of the House — Growth and Infrastructure Bill||both||no||Rebel|
|Commons||30 Mar 2011||Alcohol Marketing — Clause 152 — Restriction on issue of arrest warrants in private prosecutions||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||21 Mar 2011||United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973||tellno||aye||Rebel Teller|
|Commons||10 Feb 2011||Backbench Business — [20th Allotted Day] — Voting by Prisoners||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||9 Feb 2011||Deferred Divisions — Police||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||3 Dec 2010||Daylight Saving Bill — Conclude Second Reading debate||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|Commons||12 Nov 2010||Sustainable Livestock Bill — Closure Motion||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|Commons||2 Nov 2010||Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill — Clause 8 — 40% Minimum Turnout for Automatic Action on AV Referendum Result||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||14 Jul 2010||Terrorism Act 2006 (Disapplication of Section 25) Order 2010||minority||unknown||Unknown|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|