Voting Record — MPs for Kensington
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|Name||From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)|
|Victoria Borwick (show only their votes)||8 May 2015||3 May 2017||Con||0 votes out of 391, 0.0%||391 votes out of 467, 83.7%|
|Malcolm Rifkind (show only their votes)||6 May 2010||30 Mar 2015||Con||4 votes out of 645, 0.6%||645 votes out of 1239, 52.1%|
- See Victoria Borwick's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|Votes by Victoria Borwick MP|
|House||Date||Subject||Victoria Borwick||Con Vote||Rôle|
|no rebellions, never teller|
|Votes by Malcolm Rifkind MP|
|House||Date||Subject||Malcolm Rifkind||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||5 Dec 2014||International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill — New Clause 1 — The Independent Commission for Aid Impact To Evaluate Overseas Development Aid Spending||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||5 Dec 2014||International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill — New Clause 1 — The Independent Commission for Aid Impact To Evaluate Overseas Development Aid Spending||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||10 Jul 2012||House of Lords Reform Bill — Second Reading||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2011||Use of Hand-held Electronic Devices and Social Media in the Chamber (Backbench Business)||minority||no||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2015-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|