Jonathan R Shaw MP, Chatham and Aylesford

voted moderately for the policy

Stop climate change

by scoring 60.9% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectMr Jonathan R ShawPolicy vote
Commons10 Mar 2000Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Bill absentMajority
Commons27 Mar 2000"Table - 20. Climate change levy absentMajority
HouseDateSubjectMr Jonathan R ShawPolicy vote
Commons8 Nov 2004Housing Bill — Improvements in Energy Efficiency — rejected Majorityminority
HouseDateSubjectJonathan R ShawPolicy vote
Commons8 May 2007Climate Change — new sense of urgency — rejected Majorityminority
Commons30 Apr 2008Energy Bill — Renewable energy feed-in tariff — rejected Majorityminority
Commons2 Jun 2008Planning Bill — Consideration of climate change — rejected Majorityminority
Commons9 Jun 2008Climate Change Bill — Second Reading MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons28 Oct 2008Climate Change Bill — Electricity generating station performance standards — rejected Majorityminority
Commons28 Oct 2008Climate Change Bill — International aviation and shipping emission projections — rejected Majorityminority
Commons28 Oct 2008Climate Change Bill — Report on the civil estate MajorityMajority
Commons28 Oct 2008Climate Change Bill — Third Reading (and other amendments) MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Oct 2009Government to sign up to 10:10 climate change campaign — rejected Majorityminority

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy2100100
MP voted against policy000
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy11010
MP voted against policy7070
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*224
Total:112184

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
112
184
 = 60.9 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive