Voting Record — Andrew Stephenson MP, Pendle (24759)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Con||9 votes out of 640, 1.4%||640 votes out of 782, 81.8%||0 times|
- See Andrew Stephenson's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Andrew Stephenson||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||21 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Schedule 6 — Marriage overseas||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 8 — Domestic protection for persons||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 6 — Beliefs about marriage||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 3 — Conscientious objection: transitional arrangments||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||5 Feb 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||United Kingdom Borders — Sittings of the House (Tuesdays) (11.30 am to 7.00 pm)||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||United Kingdom Borders — Sittings of the House (Tuesdays) (No change)||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2010||Draft EU Budget 2011||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||15 Jun 2010||Business of the House — Backbench Business Committee||minority||no||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|