Voting Record — Baroness Stedman-Scott (25001)
Baroness Stedman-Scott is currently Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip), and Deputy Chairman of Committees,
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|19 Jul 2010||still in office||Con||1 vote out of 594, 0.2%||594 votes out of 681, 87.2%||0 times|
- See Baroness Stedman-Scott's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Baroness Stedman-Scott||Con Vote||Rôle|
|27 Oct 2017||Stopped being Member, Citizenship and Civic Engagement Committee|
|27 Oct 2017||Became Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip),|
|29 Jun 2017||Became Member, Citizenship and Civic Engagement Committee|
|26 Mar 2017||Stopped being Member, Select Committee on Charities|
|25 May 2016||Became Member, Select Committee on Charities|
|16 Mar 2016||Stopped being Member, Social Mobility Committee|
|11 Jun 2015||Became Member, Social Mobility Committee|
|8 Jun 2015||Became Deputy Chairman of Committees,|
|30 Mar 2015||Stopped being Member, Information Committee (Lords)|
|Lords||8 Jul 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Report (1st Day)||Majority||unknown||Unknown|
|18 Jun 2013||Stopped being Member, Parliamentary Privilege (Joint Committee)|
|9 Jan 2013||Became Member, Parliamentary Privilege (Joint Committee)|
|Lords||26 Mar 2012||Procedure of the House — Motion to Agree||minority||aye||Rebel|
|22 Jun 2010||Became Member, Information Committee (Lords)|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-2015, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|