Boris Johnson MP, Henley

voted strongly for the policy

Fox hunting - Don't ban

by scoring 99.5% compared to the votes below

Someone who believes that people should have the right to hunt wild animals (primarily foxes) with hounds would cast votes described by the policy.

Hunting with Dogs: Self-Supervision Scheme - 18 Mar 2002 - Division No. 197
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'Aye
Boris JohnsonAye
Con1387
Lab0355
LDem1034
Total156403

The Aye-voters failed to pass the motion:

This House considers that arrangements for the supervision of the hunting of wild mammals with dogs should be given statutory effect by provision similar to Schedule 1 to the Hunting Bill as introduced into the Commons last session.

The rejected schedule would allowed hunting to continue under a self-supervision scheme.

Hunting with Dogs: Hunting Under Licence - 18 Mar 2002 - Division No. 198
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'Aye
Boris Johnsonabsent
Con1294
Lab12341
LDem1726
Total171373

The Aye-voters failed to pass the motion:

That this House considers that the hunting of wild mammals with dogs should be required to be regulated in accordance with arrangements similar to those set out in Schedule 2 to the Hunting Bill as introduced into the Commons last session [Bill 2].-[Alun Michael.]
The rejected schedule would allowed hunting to continue under a licensing scheme.
Hunting with Dogs: Ban - 18 Mar 2002 - Division No. 199
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'No (strong)
Boris JohnsonNo
Con7145
Lab3525
LDem2714
Total388177

The Aye-voters passed the motion:

That this House considers that the hunting of wild mammals with dogs should be prohibited in accordance with provision similar to Schedule 3 to the Hunting Bill as introduced in the Commons last Session [Bill 2].-[Alun Michael.]

This vote indicated a preference to ban hunting with dogs instead of allowing it to continue under either a self-supervision or a licensing scheme.

Hunting Bill — New Clause 6 — Use of Dogs Below Ground (No. 2) - 30 Jun 2003 - Division No. 259
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'Aye
Boris JohnsonAye
Con1405
Lab3336
LDem1531
Total167375

The Aye-voters failed to pass an amendment by the Middle Way group to add new clause 6:

(1) Registration under Part 2 may be effected in respect of hunting that involves the use of a dog below ground.
(2) The Secretary of State may make regulations for the recognition of any existing body as the proper authority for making a code in respect of the conduct of any activity in connection with the use of dogs below ground on wild mammals.

The unamended Bill banned hunting with terriers underground but the amendment would have allowed it to be licensed.

Hunting Bill — New Clause 11 — Registration in Respect of Hunting of Foxes - 30 Jun 2003 - Division No. 260
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'No (strong)
Boris JohnsonNo
Con6116
Lab33012
LDem2618
Total364156

The Aye-voters successfully passed an amendment to add new clause 11:

Registration under Part 2 shall not be effected in respect of the hunting of foxes.

This was the key amendment in changing the Bill away from the Government's proposal for registered hunting. The amendment made the bill absolutely ban the hunting of foxes with dogs.

Hunting Bill — New Clause 14 — Registration in Respect of Hunting of Mink - 30 Jun 2003 - Division No. 261
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'No
Boris JohnsonNo
Con5132
Lab3095
LDem2616
Total343162

The Aye-voters successfully passed an amendment to add new clause 14:

Registration under Part 2 shall not be effected in respect of the hunting of mink.

This amendment was the "sister amendment" to one banning the hunting of foxes. This amendment absolutely banned the hunting of mink with dogs.

Hunting Bill - 15 Sep 2004 - Division No. 250
Policy 'Fox hunting - Don't ban'No (strong)
Boris JohnsonNo
Con6137
Lab3183
LDem3216
Total358168

The Aye voters supported the second reading of the Hunting Bill, knowing that it was identical to the Bill to which the House of Commons gave a Third Reading on 9 July 2003. (This was the criterion that would allow the Parliament Act to be used to pass the Bill.)

Question put, That the Bill be read a Second time:-

The House divided: Ayes 356, Noes 166.

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy3150150
MP voted against policy000
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy33030
MP voted against policy000
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*112
Total:181182

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
181
182
 = 99.5 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive