Voting Record — Chris White MP, Warwick and Leamington (24959)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Con||9 votes out of 644, 1.4%||644 votes out of 782, 82.4%||0 times|
- See Chris White's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Chris White||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||21 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Schedule 6 — Marriage overseas||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 8 — Domestic protection for persons||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 6 — Beliefs about marriage||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 3 — Conscientious objection: transitional arrangments||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||16 Apr 2013||Business without Debate — Development orders: development within the curtilage of a dwelling house||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||5 Feb 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||10 Jul 2012||House of Lords Reform Bill — 2nd Reading vote||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||30 Nov 2011||Hairdressers Registration (Amendment)||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2010||Public Houses and Private Members' Clubs (Smoking) Bill||Majority||aye||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|