David Davis MP, Haltemprice and Howden

voted strongly for the policy

Innocent until proven guilty

by scoring 94.9% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectDavid DavisPolicy vote
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading — Amendment minorityminority
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading minorityminority
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendment to Clause 1 — Power to make control orders minorityminority (strong)
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — New Clause 6 — Court of Terrorism Control minorityminority
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Clauses 1 to 13 minorityminority
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Third Reading minorityminority
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Derogating Control Orders minorityminority
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment to Clause 3 — Balance of Probability minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendments — Application to a Court minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Human Rights Obligations minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Conrol Orders minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Again — Courts and Control Orders minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review minorityminority
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Control Orders minorityminority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectDavid DavisPolicy vote
Commons22 Feb 2007Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 Majorityminority
Commons21 Feb 2008Control orders — Annual renewal 2008 absentminority
HouseDateSubjectDavid DavisPolicy vote
Commons3 Mar 2009Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 absentminority
Commons8 Feb 2010Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill (Allocation of Time) — Clause 1 — Temporary validity of certain Orders in Council absentminority
Commons1 Mar 2010Control Orders — Annual Renewal 2010 minorityminority

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy2100100
MP voted against policy000
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy14140140
MP voted against policy1010
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*336
Total:243256

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
243
256
 = 94.9 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive