Voting Record — Gareth Johnson MP, Dartford (24803)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Con||7 votes out of 1022, 0.7%||1022 votes out of 1218, 83.9%||0 times|
- See Gareth Johnson's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Gareth Johnson||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||23 Feb 2015||Isil — New Clause 1 — Termination of pregnancy on the grounds of the sex of the unborn child||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||10 Feb 2014||Children and Families Bill — Offence of Smoking in a Private Vehicle When A Person Under 18 is Present||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — New Clause 10 — Civil Partnerships for All Couples||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — New Clause 16 — Review Civil Partnerships Following Introduction of Same-Sex Marriage||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||House of Commons to Sit on Tuesdays from 7pm until 10pm to Consider Private Members' Bills||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||10 Jul 2012||House of Lords Reform Bill — Second Reading||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||7 Dec 2011||London Local Authorities Bill — Clause 4 — Power to Require Name and Address for Council Officers, PCSOs and Accredited Individuals When Issuing FPNs||Majority||aye||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|