Voting Record — Guy Opperman MP, Hexham (24962)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||30 Mar 2015||Con||9 votes out of 938, 1.0%||938 votes out of 1239, 75.7%||0 times|
- See Guy Opperman's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Guy Opperman||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||21 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Third Reading||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — New Clause 8 — Domestic protection for persons||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — New Clause 6 — Protection of Beliefs About Marriage||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — New Clause 3 — Conscientious Objection From Registrars to Marrying Same Sex Couples||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||5 Feb 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Second Reading||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||Thursdays||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||Sitting Times of the House of Commons on Tuesdays||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||House of Commons Sitting Start Time on Tuesdays||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||30 Nov 2011||Regulation of Hairdressers — Fines for Hairdressing Commercially Without a Licence||minority||no||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|