Heidi Alexander MP, Lewisham East

voted strongly against the policy

Schools - Greater Autonomy

by scoring 0.0% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectHeidi AlexanderPolicy vote
Commons19 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Decline Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons19 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Permitting Special Schools to Become Academies minorityMajority
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — New Academies Only Where There is Proven Need -rejected minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Personal, Social and Health Education in Academy School Curricula -rejected minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Require Academies to Comply with the School Admissions Code — rejected minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Academy Schools to Comply with Exclusion and Behaviour Legislation — rejected minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Selective Schools Becoming Academies Exempt from Requirement to Provide Education for Pupils of Different Abilities minorityMajority
Commons26 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Clause 16 — Pre-commencement applications etc minorityMajority
Commons26 Jul 2010Academies Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons8 Feb 2011Education Bill (second reading) minorityMajority (strong)
Commons11 May 2011Education Bill — New Clause 9 — Requirement to achieve specified standard: suppliers of careers guidance minorityMajority (strong)
Commons11 May 2011Education Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons30 Oct 2013Opposition Day — Require State School Teachers to Have or be Working Towards Qualified Teacher Status minorityMajority (strong)
Commons29 Jan 2014Opposition Day — Qualified Teacher Status minorityMajority (strong)

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy120600
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy3030
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*000
Total:0630

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
0
630
 = 0.0 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive