Voting Comparison — John Gummer MP, Suffolk Coastal
to Douglas Hogg MP, Sleaford and North Hykeham
John Gummer
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
| Constituency | From | To | Party | Rebellions (explain...) | Attendance (explain...) | Teller |
| House of Lords | 21 Jun 2010 | still in office | Con | 130 votes out of 676, 19.2% | 676 votes out of 1418, 47.7% | 0 times |
| Suffolk Coastal | 5 May 2005 | 12 Apr 2010 | Con | 18 votes out of 678, 2.7% | 678 votes out of 1288, 52.6% | 0 times |
| Suffolk Coastal | 7 Jun 2001 | 11 Apr 2005 | Con | 8 votes out of 713, 1.1% | 713 votes out of 1246, 57.2% | 0 times |
| Suffolk Coastal | 1 May 1997 | 14 May 2001 | Con | 5 votes out of 577, 0.9% | 577 votes out of 1273, 45.3% | 0 times |
Voting Differences
| House | Date | Subject | Lord Deben | Douglas Hogg | Rôle | |
| no votes listed | ||||||
| House | Date | Subject | John Gummer | Douglas Hogg | Rôle | |
| no votes listed | ||||||
| House | Date | Subject | John Gummer | Douglas Hogg | Rôle | |
| no votes listed | ||||||
| House | Date | Subject | John Gummer | Douglas Hogg | Rôle | |
| Commons | 27 Feb 2001 | Hunting Bill | minority | tellno | agrees with policy | |
| Commons | 27 Feb 2001 | Hunting Bill | minority | tellaye | agrees with policy | |
| Commons | 27 Feb 2001 | Hunting Bill | minority | tellaye | agrees with policy | |
| Commons | 24 Jan 2001 | Deferred Divisions - European Communities | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Commons | 24 Jan 2001 | Deferred Divisions - Local Government | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Commons | 24 Jan 2001 | Deferred Divisions - Sport | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |
| Commons | 19 Dec 2000 | Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations | minority | aye | disagrees with policy | |
| Commons | 22 Nov 2000 | Fur Farming (Prohibition) Bill - Compensation for existing businesses | minority | tellaye | agrees with policy | |
| Commons | 10 Nov 1999 | House of Lords Bill — Exceptions from the rule that hereditary peers should be abolished | Majority | no | disagrees with policy | |