Kelvin Hopkins MP, Luton North

voted strongly against the policy

Reduce the rate of Corporation Tax

by scoring 7.7% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectKelvin HopkinsPolicy vote
Commons6 Jul 2010Finance Bill — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons20 Jul 2010Finance Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons29 Mar 2011March 2011 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons26 Apr 2011Finance Bill — Reject Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons26 Apr 2011Finance Bill 2011 — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons5 Jul 2011Finance Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons26 Mar 2012March 2012 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons16 Apr 2012Finance Bill — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons16 Apr 2012Finance Bill (carry over) minorityMajority (strong)
Commons3 Jul 2012Finance Bill 2012 — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons25 Mar 2013March 2013 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons15 Apr 2013Finance Bill 2013 — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons2 Jul 2013Finance Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons25 Mar 2014March 2014 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons25 Mar 2014Budget Resolution — To Charge Corporation Tax for 2014-15 minorityminority (strong)
Commons23 Mar 2015March 2015 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons25 Mar 2015Finance Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectKelvin HopkinsPolicy vote
Commons14 Jul 2015Summer Budget 2015 minorityMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2015Finance Bill 2015-16 — Decline Second Reading absentMajority (strong)
Commons21 Jul 2015Finance Bill 2015-16 — Second Reading absentMajority (strong)
Commons26 Oct 2015Finance Bill 2015-16 — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons22 Mar 2016March 2016 Budget minorityMajority (strong)
Commons11 Apr 2016Finance Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17 — Second Reading minorityMajority (strong)
Commons28 Jun 2016Finance Bill — Clause 42 — Rate of Corporation Tax for Financial Year 2020 minorityMajority (strong)
Commons5 Sep 2016Finance Bill — Clause 45 — Rate of Corporation Tax for Financial Year 2020 minorityMajority (strong)
Commons6 Sep 2016Finance Bill — Third Reading minorityMajority (strong)

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy15050
MP voted against policy2301150
MP absent250100
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy000
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*000
Total:1001300

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
100
1300
 = 7.7 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive