Voting Record — Kevin Foster MP, Torbay (25338)
Kevin Foster is currently Member, Backbench Business Committee, Member, Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee) and Member, Public Accounts Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|8 May 2015||still in office||Con||3 votes out of 422, 0.7%||422 votes out of 467, 90.4%||5 times|
- See Kevin Foster's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Kevin Foster||Con Vote||Rôle|
|13 Jun 2016||Became Member, Backbench Business Committee|
|12 May 2016||Stopped being Member, Backbench Business Committee|
|Commons||20 Apr 2016||Printing Acts of Parliament on Vellum||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|Commons||20 Apr 2016||Backbench Business — Daesh: Genocide of Minorities — Referral to UN — Juristiction for International Criminal Court||tellno||aye||Rebel Teller|
|Commons||22 Jan 2016||Motion to Sit in Private||tellaye||no||Rebel Teller|
|14 Dec 2015||Became Member, Backbench Business Committee|
|Commons||4 Dec 2015||Motion to Sit in Private||tellaye||no||Rebel Teller|
|28 Oct 2015||Became Member, Ecclesiastical Committee (Joint Committee)|
|Commons||23 Oct 2015||Defence Expenditure (NATO Target) Bill — Second Reading||tellaye||aye||Teller|
|7 Jul 2015||Became Member, Public Accounts Committee|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2015-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|