Kit Malthouse MP, North West Hampshire

voted strongly against the policy

Protect tenants & leasholders from safety costs

by scoring 0.0% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectKit MalthousePolicy vote
Commons24 Feb 2021Fire Safety Bill — After Clause 2 — Prohibition on Passing Remediation Costs on to Leaseholders and Tenants Majorityminority (strong)
Commons22 Mar 2021Fire Safety Bill — After Clause 2 — Prohibition on Passing Remediation Costs on to Leaseholders and Tenants Majorityminority (strong)
Commons27 Apr 2021Fire Safety Bill — After Clause 2 — Prohibition on Passing Remediation Costs on to Leaseholders and Tenants Majorityminority (strong)
Commons28 Apr 2021Fire Safety Bill — After Clause 2 — Legislative Proposals Relating to Prohibition on Passing Remediation Costs on to Leaseholders and Tenants Majorityminority (strong)
Commons18 May 2021Queen's Speech — Programme for Government — Affordable and Safe Housing for All Majorityminority (strong)
Commons19 Jan 2022Building Safety Bill — New Clause 3 — Remediation Costs and Building Works Agency Majorityminority (strong)
Commons20 Apr 2022Building Safety Bill — Before Clause 117 — Meaning of “Relevant Building” — Exclusion of Short Buildings from Leaseholder Protection Scheme Majorityminority (strong)
Commons20 Apr 2022Building Safety Bill — Before Clause 117 — Meaning of “Relevant Building” — Exclusion of Short Buildings from Leaseholder Protection Scheme Majorityminority (strong)
Commons20 Apr 2022Building Safety Bill — Before Clause 117 — Meaning of “Relevant Building” — Caps on Remediation Charges Passed to Leaseholders Majorityminority (strong)
Commons20 Apr 2022Building Safety Bill — Before Clause 117 — Meaning of “Relevant Building” — Caps on Remediation Charges Passed to Leaseholders Majorityminority (strong)

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy100500
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy000
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*000
Total:0500

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
0
500
 = 0.0 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive