Voting Record — Lord Irvine of Lairg (13489)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
- See Lord Irvine of Lairg's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Lord Irvine of Lairg||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Lords||16 Jan 2015||Assisted Dying Bill [HL] — Committee (2nd Day)||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||21 Jul 2014||Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Committee (2nd Day)||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||7 Jul 2009||Coroners and Justice Bill — Committee (5th Day) — assisted suicide||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||13 Oct 2008||Counter-Terrorism Bill — No extension of period of detention beyond 28 days||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||23 Apr 2008||Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||8 Mar 2005||Prevention of Terrorism Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||7 Mar 2005||Prevention of Terrorism Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||18 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill — reaction to Commons Amendments||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||11 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill: amendment — commencement||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||27 Oct 2004||Hunting Bill: amendment — tests for registered hunting||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||21 Oct 2003||Hunting Bill — amendment — registered hunting||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||21 Oct 2003||Hunting Bill: amendment — "intentional" hunting||Majority||no||Rebel|
|12 Jun 2003||Stopped being Lord Chancellor, Lord Chancellor's Department|
|2 May 1997||Became Lord Chancellor, Lord Chancellor's Department|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|100.0%||Baroness Campbell of Loughborough||Crossbench|
|100.0%||Baroness Hale of Richmond||Judge|
|100.0%||Baroness Jones of Whitchurch||Lab|