Voting Record — Lord MacKenzie of Culkein (13124)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|30 Nov 1998||still in office||Lab||11 votes out of 1580, 0.7%||1580 votes out of 2111, 74.8%||0 times|
- See Lord MacKenzie of Culkein's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Lord MacKenzie of Culkein||Lab Vote||Rôle|
|Lords||24 Feb 2016||Scotland Bill — Report (1st Day)||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||29 Oct 2013||Care Bill [HL] — Third Reading||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|22 Jul 2008||Stopped being Member, Draft Marine Bill (Joint Committee)|
|13 May 2008||Became Member, Draft Marine Bill (Joint Committee)|
|Lords||4 Jul 2007||Pensions Bill||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||12 May 2006||Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill — Delay Second Reading||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||17 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill — Commons proposals on commencement||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||17 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill — Lords Amendment — commencement||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||17 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill — Lords Amendment||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||11 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill: amendment — commencement||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||11 Nov 2004||Hunting Bill: amendment — registered hunting||minority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||19 Mar 2002||Hunting with dogs: Ban||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Lords||30 Apr 2001||Liaison: Select Committee Report||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Lords||2 Dec 1999||Succession to the Crown (Amendment)||Majority||unknown||Unknown|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 1997-2001, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|100.0%||Baroness Hale of Richmond||Judge|
|100.0%||Baroness Jones of Whitchurch||Lab|