Mark Hoban MP, Fareham

voted strongly for the policy

Post office closures - against

by scoring 99.2% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectMr Mark HobanPolicy vote
Commons29 Jan 2002Post Office — Condemnation of government mismanagement — rejected minorityminority
Commons15 May 2002Post Office Closures — Deep concern — rejected minorityminority
Commons15 Oct 2002Urban Post Office Reinvention Programme — £210 million authorization tellnominority
Commons13 Jan 2004Future of the Post Office Network — Deplores the programme — rejected minorityminority
Commons13 Jan 2004Future of the Post Office Network — Congratulates the Government minorityminority
Commons24 Mar 2004Post Office Services — Calls for systematic consultation before closure — rejected minorityminority
Commons24 Mar 2004Post Office Services — Welcomes £2 billion investment minorityminority
Commons5 Jul 2004Postal Services — Calls for details of Exceptions Service — rejected minorityminority
HouseDateSubjectMark HobanPolicy vote
Commons16 Oct 2006Post Office network — Concern for delays in investment package — rejected absentminority
Commons10 Jan 2007Sub Post-Offices — Condemnation of closure plan — rejected minorityminority
Commons10 Jan 2007Sub Post-Offices — Applauds the Government record minorityminority
Commons19 Mar 2008Post Office Closures — Suspend for issues to be re-assessed — rejected minorityminority
Commons19 Mar 2008Post Office Closures — Commends the Government's action minorityminority

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy000
MP voted against policy000
MP absent000
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy12120120
MP voted against policy000
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*112
Total:121122

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
121
122
 = 99.2 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive