Nick Hurd MP, Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner

voted moderately for the policy

Promote Occupational Pensions

by scoring 68.8% compared to the votes below

Why Majority/minority instead of Aye/No?
HouseDateSubjectNick HurdPolicy vote
Commons8 Mar 2010Delegated Legislation — Pensions — Automatic Enrolment Regulations absentMajority (strong)
HouseDateSubjectNick HurdPolicy vote
Commons28 Jun 2010Emergency Budget — Pensions MajorityMajority (strong)
Commons20 Jun 2011Pensions Bill 2010/11 — Second Reading MajorityMajority
Commons18 Oct 2011Pensions Bill — Third Reading absentMajority (strong)

How the number is calculated

The MP's votes count towards a weighted average where the most important votes get 50 points, less important votes get 10 points, and less important votes for which the MP was absent get 2 points. In important votes the MP gets awarded the full 50 points for voting the same as the policy, no points for voting against the policy, and 25 points for not voting. In less important votes, the MP gets 10 points for voting with the policy, no points for voting against, and 1 (out of 2) if absent.

Questions about this formula can be discussed on the forum.

No of votesPointsOut of
Most important votes (50 points)   
MP voted with policy15050
MP voted against policy000
MP absent250100
Less important votes (10 points)   
MP voted with policy11010
MP voted against policy000
Less important absentees (2 points)   
MP absent*000
Total:110160

*Pressure of other work means MPs or Lords are not always available to vote – it does not always indicate they have abstained. Therefore, being absent on a less important vote makes a disproportionatly small difference.

agreement score
MP's points
total points
 = 
110
160
 = 68.8 %.


About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive