Voting Record — Robert Buckland MP, South Swindon (24843)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Con||9 votes out of 823, 1.1%||823 votes out of 925, 89.0%||0 times|
- See Robert Buckland's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Robert Buckland||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 10 — Part 1 of the Civil Partnership Act 2004||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 16 — Review of civil partnership||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||11 Jul 2012||United Kingdom Borders — Sittings of the House (Thursdays) (9.30 am to 5.00 pm)||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||12 Mar 2012||Communities and Local Government — Backbench Business Committee||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||12 Mar 2012||Communities and Local Government — Backbench Business Committee||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2011||Use of hand-held electronic devices and social media in the chamber (Backbench Business)||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||7 Sep 2011||Health and Social Care Bill 2011 — Independent Abortion Advice||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||1 Dec 2010||Fixed Term Parliaments Bill — Clause 2 — Early parliamentary general elections||minority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||15 Jun 2010||Business of the House — Backbench Business Committee||minority||no||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|