Voting Record — Stephen Phillips MP, Sleaford and North Hykeham (24836)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
|From||To||Party||Rebellions (explain...)||Attendance (explain...)||Teller|
|6 May 2010||still in office||Con||7 votes out of 734, 1.0%||734 votes out of 802, 91.5%||0 times|
- See Stephen Phillips's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
- Contact your MP for free at: WriteToThem.com
- Form a long term relationship with your MP: HearFromYourMP.com
Votes in parliament for which this MP's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this MP was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
|House||Date||Subject||Stephen Phillips||Con Vote||Rôle|
|Commons||5 Jun 2013||Opposition Day — [1st Allotted Day] — Badger Cull||both||no||Rebel|
|Commons||21 May 2013||Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill — Schedule 6 — Marriage overseas||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||20 May 2013||Work and Pensions — New Clause 8 — Domestic protection for persons||Majority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||25 Oct 2012||Business of the House — Badger Cull||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||18 Oct 2012||Bills Presented — European Union (Croatian Accession and Irish Protocol) Bill — Backbench Business — 2nd Battalion the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Jul 2011||Youth Employment||both||no||Rebel|
|Commons||22 Jun 2011||Smoking in Private Vehicles||Majority||no||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2010||London Local Authorities Bill — Second Reading||minority||aye||Rebel|
|Commons||13 Oct 2010||Public Houses and Private Members' Clubs (Smoking) Bill||Majority||aye||Rebel|
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this MP and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Shows which MPs voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both MPs attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between MPs that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
|No results found|