Voting Record — The Earl of Leicester (26036)
The Earl of Leicester is currently Member, Environment and Climate Change Committee
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
| From | To | Party | Rebellions (explain...) | Attendance (explain...) | Teller |
| 23 Jun 2021 | still in office | Con | 3 votes out of 297, 1.0% | 297 votes out of 446, 66.6% | 0 times |
External Links
- See The Earl of Leicester's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Interesting Votes
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
See also all votes... attended | possible
| House | Date | Subject | The Earl of Leicester | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| 31 Jan 2024 | Became Member, Environment and Climate Change Committee | |||||
| 28 Nov 2022 | Stopped being Member, Land Use in England Committee | |||||
| Lords | 12 Oct 2022 | Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill - Report — Amendment 28 | Majority | no | Rebel | |
| Lords | 4 Apr 2022 | Nationality and Borders Bill - Commons Amendments — Motion E1 (as an amendment to Motion E) | Majority | no | Rebel | |
| 19 Jan 2022 | Became Member, Land Use in England Committee | |||||
| Lords | 6 Dec 2021 | Animal Welfare (Sentience) Bill [HL] - Report (Continued) — Amendment 27 | minority | no | Rebel | |
Policy Comparisons
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this Lord and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
| No policies match this person's votes. You can edit or make a policy that will appear here. | |||
| Agreement | Policy | ||
Possible Friends (more...)
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 2019-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
| Agreement | Name | Party | |
| No results found | |||