Voting Record — The Marquess of Lothian (10010)
Note: our records only go back to 1997 for the Commons and 2001 for the Lords (more details).
| Constituency | From | To | Party | Rebellions (explain...) | Attendance (explain...) | Teller |
| House of Lords | 22 Nov 2010 | still in office | Con | 1 vote out of 124, 0.8% | 124 votes out of 308, 40.3% | 0 times |
| Devizes | 5 May 2005 | 12 Apr 2010 | Con | 4 votes out of 625, 0.6% | 625 votes out of 1288, 48.5% | 0 times |
| Devizes | 7 Jun 2001 | 11 Apr 2005 | Con | 1 vote out of 566, 0.2% | 566 votes out of 1246, 45.4% | 0 times |
| Devizes | 1 May 1997 | 14 May 2001 | Con | 1 vote out of 573, 0.2% | 573 votes out of 1273, 45.0% | 0 times |
External Links
- See The Marquess of Lothian's Parliamentary speeches at: TheyWorkForYou.com
Interesting Votes
Votes in parliament for which this Lord's vote differed from the majority vote of their party (Rebel), or in which this Lord was a teller (Teller), or both (Rebel Teller).
See also all votes... attended | possible
| House | Date | Subject | The Marquess of Lothian | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| Lords | 21 Oct 2011 | House of Lords Reform Bill [HL] — Committee | minority | aye | Rebel | |
| 11 May 2010 | Stopped being a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| House | Date | Subject | Michael Ancram | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| 25 Mar 2010 | Became a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| 25 Mar 2010 | Stopped being a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| Commons | 22 Oct 2008 | Point of Order — Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill [ Lords] (Programme) (No. 2) | Majority | no | Rebel | |
| 15 Jul 2008 | Became a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| 15 Jul 2008 | Stopped being a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| Commons | 20 May 2008 | Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill — Change abortion limit from 24 weeks to 16 weeks — rejected | minority | no | Rebel | |
| Commons | 14 Mar 2007 | Trident Replacement — Case not yet proven — rejected | minority | no | Rebel | |
| Commons | 7 Mar 2007 | House of Lords Reform — Composition Option 6 (80 per Cent. Elected) | Majority | no | Rebel | |
| 15 Aug 2006 | Became a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| 15 Aug 2006 | Stopped being a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| 3 Aug 2006 | Became a member of the Intelligence and Security (Cabinet Office) Committee | |||||
| 16 Dec 2005 | Stopped being Shadow Secretary of State for Defence & Deputy Leader, Defence | |||||
| 20 May 2005 | Stopped being Shadow Foreign Secretary & Deputy Leader, Foreign Affairs | |||||
| 20 May 2005 | Became Shadow Secretary of State for Defence & Deputy Leader, Defence | |||||
| House | Date | Subject | Earl of Michael Ancram | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| 17 Mar 2005 | Stopped being Shadow Secretary of State for International Affairs, Shadow Foreign Secretary & Deputy Leader, International Affairs | |||||
| 17 Mar 2005 | Became Shadow Foreign Secretary & Deputy Leader, Foreign Affairs | |||||
| 10 May 2004 | Became Shadow Secretary of State for International Affairs, Shadow Foreign Secretary & Deputy Leader, International Affairs | |||||
| Commons | 4 Feb 2003 | House of Lords Reform — Option 4 (80 per Cent. Elected) — rejected | minority | no | Rebel | |
| House | Date | Subject | Earl of Michael Ancram | Con Vote | Rôle | |
| Commons | 20 Dec 2000 | Deferred Divisions - Deregulation | minority | aye | Rebel | |
| Commons | 13 Dec 2000 | Deferred Divisions - Fisheries: Total Allowable Catches and Quotas 2001 | both | no | Rebel | |
Policy Comparisons
This chart shows the percentage agreement between this person and each of the policies in the database, according to their voting record.
Possible Friends (more...)
Shows which Lords voted most similarly to this one in the 2010-present, Westminster Parliament. This is measured from 0% agreement (never voted the same) to 100% (always voted the same). Only votes that both Lords attended are counted. This may reveal relationships between Lords that were previously unsuspected. Or it may be nonsense.
| Agreement | Name | Party | |
| No results found | |||
