Policy #981: "Control Orders" — Compared to LDem Party

This is the votes by vote definition of Public Whip policy #981: "Control Orders". You may want to read an introduction to policies, or read more about Public Whip.

Someone who believes that the government should get all the powers for making Control Orders it asks for against terrorist suspects, with as little judicial oversight as possible would have voted like this...

The LDem votes are listed along side.

HouseDateSubjectLDem Policy AgreementLDem Turnout
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading — Amendment 0.0%87.3%
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading 0.0%87.3%
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Committee of the whole House 0.0%81.8%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Alteration n / a 52.7%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendment to Clause 1 — Power to make control orders 0.0%69.1%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — New Clause 6 — Court of Terrorism Control 0.0%67.3%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Clauses 1 to 13 0.0%67.3%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Third Reading 0.0%70.9%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Lords' Amendments 0.0%83.6%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Derogating Control Orders 0.0%96.4%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment to Clause 3 — Balance of Probability 0.0%96.4%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Clause — Duration of Control Orders 0.0%96.4%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Clause — Review by Privy Council 0.0%94.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Amendment — Sunset Clause 0.0%94.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment — Rules of the Court n / a 94.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment — Human Rights Obligations 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendments — Application to a Court 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Human Rights Obligations 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Conrol Orders 0.0%94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 0.0%92.7%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 0.0%92.7%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Again — Courts and Control Orders 0.0%92.7%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 0.0%92.7%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendments — Burden of Proof n / a 94.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Control Orders 0.0%96.4%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 0.0%96.4%
Lords15 Feb 2006Control Orders — Annual renewal 2006 — Regrets the inadiquate safeguards — rejected 0.0%33.8%
Commons22 Feb 2007Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 0.0%87.3%
Lords5 Mar 2007Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 — Regrets the they have not been replaced — rejected 0.0%64.6%
Commons21 Feb 2008Control orders — Annual renewal 2008 0.0%79.4%
Commons3 Mar 2009Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 0.0%90.5%
Lords5 Mar 2009Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 — Declines to approve — rejected 0.0%50.7%
Scotland5 Mar 2009[S3M-3609.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time 0.0%93.8%
Commons1 Mar 2010Control Orders — Annual Renewal 2010 0.0%88.9%

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive