Policy #981: "Control Orders" — Compared to Lab Party

This is the votes by vote definition of Public Whip policy #981: "Control Orders". You may want to read an introduction to policies, or read more about Public Whip.

Someone who believes that the government should get all the powers for making Control Orders it asks for against terrorist suspects, with as little judicial oversight as possible would have voted like this...

The Lab votes are listed along side.

HouseDateSubjectLab Policy AgreementLab Turnout
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading — Amendment 95.8%81.1%
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Second Reading 90.7%84.1%
Commons23 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Committee of the whole House 95.9%78.4%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Alteration n / a 75.0%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendment to Clause 1 — Power to make control orders 81.2%80.9%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — New Clause 6 — Court of Terrorism Control 98.3%71.3%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Clauses 1 to 13 96.6%71.8%
Commons28 Feb 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Third Reading 89.8%74.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Programme — Lords' Amendments 95.2%87.0%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Derogating Control Orders 93.2%90.2%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment to Clause 3 — Balance of Probability 90.1%91.2%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Clause — Duration of Control Orders 92.1%90.0%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Clause — Review by Privy Council 94.0%89.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of New Lords' Amendment — Sunset Clause 93.7%89.5%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment — Rules of the Court n / a 84.1%
Commons9 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Rejection of Lords' Amendment — Human Rights Obligations 93.2%82.4%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendments — Application to a Court 91.7%86.0%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 94.8%84.8%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 93.1%85.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Human Rights Obligations 93.1%85.5%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Conrol Orders 92.6%79.4%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 95.4%80.1%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 93.9%80.6%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Again — Courts and Control Orders 94.4%78.4%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review 97.2%77.9%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Amendments — Burden of Proof n / a 80.4%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Courts and Control Orders 95.3%82.6%
Commons10 Mar 2005Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Weak Sunset Clause 100.0%80.1%
Lords15 Feb 2006Control Orders — Annual renewal 2006 — Regrets the inadiquate safeguards — rejected 98.7%37.3%
Commons22 Feb 2007Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 99.1%63.6%
Lords5 Mar 2007Control Orders — Annual renewal 2007 — Regrets the they have not been replaced — rejected 96.5%65.3%
Commons21 Feb 2008Control orders — Annual renewal 2008 98.9%77.3%
Commons3 Mar 2009Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 93.8%82.3%
Lords5 Mar 2009Control Orders — Annual renewal 2009 — Declines to approve — rejected 100.0%45.9%
Scotland5 Mar 2009[S3M-3609.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time 0.0%93.5%
Commons1 Mar 2010Control Orders — Annual Renewal 2010 89.6%65.9%

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive