Wild Mammals (Hunting with Dogs) Bill — Fox control in national parks — 6 Mar 1998
Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield voted in the minority (No).
As amended (in the Standing Committee), considered.
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
With this, it will be convenient to discuss the following: New clause 3-- Mink --
Under the clause, if a dog is used to stalk a wild mammal, steps must be taken to shoot the wild mammal as soon as possible, so it follows that a dog must not, in any circumstances, be allowed to kill it. However, the Bill permits dogs to be used for certain purposes.
Question put, That the Question be now put:--
The House proceeded to a Division--
The House having divided: Ayes 186, Noes 60.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||3||53 (+2 tell)||0||35.8%|
|Lab||175 (+2 tell)||0||0||42.4%|
|Mr David Atkinson||Bournemouth East||Con||aye|
|Peter Bottomley||Worthing West||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Roger Gale||North Thanet||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Alan Beith||Berwick-upon-Tweed||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Mr Richard Livsey||Brecon and Radnorshire||LDem (front bench)||no|