House of Lords Bill — New Clause — 10 Nov 1999
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset voted in the minority (No).
Lords amendment agreed to.
Lords amendment: No. 2, after clause 1, to insert the following new clause-- Appointments Commission --
I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Mr. Deputy Speaker:
With this, it will be convenient to take Lords amendment No. 13 and the motion to disagree.
That, at this day's sitting, consideration of Lords Amendments to the House of Lords Bill, the Motion in the name of Margaret Beckett relating to Business of the House, and consideration of any Messages from the Lords relating to the House of Lords Bill may be proceeded with, though opposed, until any hour.-- [Mr. Jamieson.]
Question agreed to.
Lords amendments again considered.
Question again proposed, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment:--
The House divided: Ayes 353, Noes 133.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||128 (+2 tell)||0||80.7%|
|Lab||333 (+2 tell)||0||0||80.5%|
|Phil Willis||Harrogate and Knaresborough||LDem (front bench)||no|