[S1M-569.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 23 Feb 2000 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-569.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-02-23 is:
*S1M-569.1 Mr John Swinney: Modernising Government—As an amendment to motion (S1M-569) in the name of Mr Jack McConnell, insert at end "and agrees that the Scottish Executive should pursue a programme to obtain greater value from existing public expenditure in Scotland, that targets for modernisation should be set against which the Executive should be monitored to assess its performance and that the Executive should take all necessary steps to ensure open, accessible and accountable government. Supported by: Dorothy-Grace Elder*, Mr Kenny MacAskill*, Michael Matheson*, Mr Andrew Welsh*
You can search for this motion (S1M-569.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-569.1, in the name of Mr Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S1M-569, in the name of Mr McConnell, on modernising government, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 72.7% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 63 | 42 | 0 | 82.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |