[S1M-675.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 23 Mar 2000 at 17:13
This looks like the vote on S1M-675.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-03-23 is:
*S1M-675.1 Alex Johnstone: Genetic Modification Science—As an amendment to motion (S1M-675) in the name of Susan Deacon, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "and, while recognising the excellence of the Scottish biotechnology industry and the benefits that GM technology has the potential to provide, calls upon the Scottish Executive to delay the recently announced farm scale trials until evidence from previous scientific tests, proving beyond any reasonable doubt that such trials pose no threat to the environment or public health, has been thoroughly evaluated by a range of independent assessors and placed in the public domain." Supported by: Alex Fergusson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-675.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-675.1, in the name of Alex Johnstone, which seeks to amend motion S1M-675, in the name of Susan Deacon, on genetic modification science, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 44 | 0 | 0 | 80.0% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| Total: | 57 | 48 | 1 | 83.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote