[S1M-868.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 18 May 2000 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-868.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-05-18 is:
*S1M-868.1 Kay Ullrich: Community Care—As an amendment to motion (S1M-868) in the name of Iain Gray, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "supports the concept of care in the community; recognises the excellent work done in the Sutherland Report on long term care With Respect to Old Age; condemns the continued failure of the Executive to implement fully the recommendations of that Royal Commission; demands adequate funding for those providing services within local government and the voluntary sector; urges the Executive to accept responsibility for community care, and invites it to provide real leadership, and the necessary funding, to enable successful joint working in this field."
You can search for this motion (S1M-868.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-868.1, in the name of Kay Ullrich, which seeks to amend motion S1M-868, in the name of Iain Gray, on community care, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 75.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 79 | 28 | 1 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||