[S1M-890.1.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 24 May 2000 at 17:03
Kenny MacAskill MP, Lothians abstained
This looks like the vote on S1M-890.1.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-05-24 is:
*S1M-890.1.1 Angus MacKay: Mike Tyson—As an amendment to amendment to motion (S1M-890.1) in the name of David McLetchie, insert at end "and, whilst recognising the widespread concerns, in this Parliament and elsewhere, about the proposed visit, believes that this Parliament should use its time to discuss and to take decisions on matters within its competence and so help to build a Scotland true to the values of fairness, equality and justice, and supports the work of the Scottish Executive in tackling domestic abuse and supporting its victims, in particular in developing effective intervention and service provision to prevent male violence against women and their children".
You can search for this motion (S1M-890.1.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are seven questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S1M-890.1.1, in the name of Angus MacKay, which seeks to amend amendment S1M-890.1 in the name of David McLetchie, on Mike Tyson, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 31 | 93.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 78 | 1 | 34 | 89.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||