[S1M-921.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Jun 2000 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-921.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-06-01 is:
*S1M-921.1 Fiona Hyslop: Tackling Rough Sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S1M-921) in the name of Ms Wendy Alexander, leave out from "welcomes" to "recognises" and insert "notes the commitment of the Scottish Executive to achieving its aim that no-one should have to sleep rough by the end of this session of the Parliament; notes that this commitment has been moved back from an original deadline of 2002, and believes that the challenge funding nature of the Rough Sleepers Initiative aligned with a general fall in housing resources is hindering the ability of the Executive to meet its target of ending rough sleeping; however recognises". Supported by: Mr Lloyd Quinan*, Tricia Marwick*
You can search for this motion (S1M-921.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-921.1, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S1M-921, in the name of Wendy Alexander, on tackling rough sleeping in Glasgow and across Scotland, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 13 | 0 | 68.4% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 49 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
Total: | 63 | 42 | 0 | 82.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote