[S1M-1092] National Parks (Scotland) Bill — 5 Jul 2000 at 09:44
This looks like the vote on S1M-1092
The description in the bulletin on 2000-07-05 is:
*S1M-1092 Mr Tom McCabe on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau: Business Motion-That the Parliament agrees that for Stage 3 of the Bail, Judicial Appointments etc. (Scotland) Bill and the National Parks (Scotland) Bill, debate on each part of the proceedings, if not previously brought to a conclusion, shall be brought to a conclusion at the following times (calculated from the time when Stage 3 of the Bail, Judicial Appointments etc. (Scotland) Bill begins) - Bail, Judicial Appointments etc. (Scotland) Bill Group 1 to Group 4 - no later than 1 hour 15 minutes Group 5 - no later than 1 hour 45 minutes Group 6 to Group 10 - no later than 3 hours Motion to pass the Bill - no later than 3 hours 30 minutes National Parks (Scotland) Bill Group 1 to Group 4 - no later than 4 hours 30 minutes Group 5 - no later than 5 hours 15 minutes Group 6 to Group 7 - no later than 6 hours Group 8 to Group 11 - no later than 7 hours Motion to pass the bill - no later than 7 hours 30 minutes. Supported by: Iain Smith*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1092) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that motion S1M-1092 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 0 | 14 | 73.7% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 75.8% |
| Total: | 63 | 28 | 14 | 82.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote