[S1M-1091.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 6 Jul 2000 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S1M-1091.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-07-06 is:
*S1M-1091.1 Kay Ullrich: Modernisation in the NHS-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1091) in the name of Susan Deacon, leave out from first "Scottish" to end and insert "failure of the Scottish Executive to tackle the chronic problems which currently exist in the health service in Scotland; calls upon the First Minister to take immediate action to address the situation; condemns the mismanagement and inaction on the part of the Executive, and demands new and imaginative methods of ensuring that the NHS in Scotland is run on the basis of patient need and not political expediency." Supported by: Mr Duncan Hamilton*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1091.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1091.1, in the name of Kay Ullrich, which seeks to amend the motion S1M-1091, in the name of Susan Deacon, on modernisation in the NHS, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 64 | 50 | 0 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||