[S1M-1215.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Sep 2000 at 16:58
This looks like the vote on S1M-1215.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-09-28 is:
*S1M-1215.1 Iain Gray: Long Term Care-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1215) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "calls" to end and insert "notes the report and recommendations of the Royal Commission on the Long Term Care of the Elderly; welcomes the Commission's emphasis on the importance of older people in our society; welcomes their concentration on issues related to the quality of care, the balance between residential care and care provided in the home, and the value of joint management and resourcing of services for older people; welcomes the additional resources announced in the spending review for the care of older people, and calls upon the Executive to ensure that these additional resources are used to deliver significant improvements in care for the largest possible number of older people, particularly those in greatest need and to continue, over time, to work towards fulfilling the Royal Commission's objectives of fairness and equity in the care of the elderly. Supported by: Susan Deacon*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1215.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-1215.1, in the name of Iain Gray, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1215, in the name of Mary Scanlon, on long-term care, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 19 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 52 | 0 | 0 | 94.5% |
| LDem | 13 | 2 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 65 | 55 | 1 | 94.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote