[S1M-1502.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Jan 2001 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-1502.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-01-11 is:
*S1M-1502.1 Fergus Ewing: Salmon Conservation (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1502) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "and notes that the measures for the conservation of salmon which the Bill will allow are limited in nature; urges the Scottish Executive to bring forward an action plan designed to conserve salmon in all phases of their life cycle, and recommends that, as the existing corpus of statute law relating to salmon fishing and conservation is both complex and fragmented, a Consolidation Bill be brought forward as soon as practicable." Supported by: Richard Lochhead*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1502.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1502.1, in the name of Fergus Ewing, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1502, in the name of Ross Finnie, which seeks agreement that the Salmon Conservation (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84.2% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 44 | 0 | 0 | 80.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 75 | 33 | 0 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |