[S1M-1639.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 14 Feb 2001 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-1639.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-14 is:
*S1M-1639.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Inquiry into the Delivery of Community Care in Scotland—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1639) in the name of Margaret Smith, leave out from "and calls upon" to end and insert "and welcomes the recommendations contained within the 16th Report 2000 by the Health and Community Care Committee, Inquiry into the Delivery of Community Care in Scotland (SP Paper 219) and further notes the announcement made by the Executive on 25 January 2001 and the establishment of the Care Development Group regarding the care for older people." Supported by: Susan Deacon*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1639.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1639.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1639, in the name of Margaret Smith, on the Health and Community Care Committee report on community care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 11 | 2 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Total: | 60 | 49 | 0 | 85.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote