[S1M-1694.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Feb 2001 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-1694.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-28 is:
*S1M-1694.2 Bruce Crawford: Sustainable Development—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1694) in the name of Mr Sam Galbraith, insert at end "however, also recognises that a great deal of work still requires to be undertaken regarding sustainable development in the fields of social inclusion, rural affairs, fishing, education, health, transport and economic development as well as in relation to the wider environmental aspects, and believes in particular that meaningful sustainability monitoring indicators should be produced by the end of May 2001. Supported by: Fergus Ewing*, Mr Kenny MacAskill*, Fiona McLeod*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1694.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S1M-1694.2, in the name of Bruce Crawford, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1694, in the name of Mr Sam Galbraith, on sustainable development, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 72.7% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 76 | 27 | 0 | 80.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote