[S1M-1794.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Mar 2001 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-1794.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-03-28 is:
*S1M-1794.1 Angus MacKay: Financial Powers of the Parliament—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1794) in the name of Andrew Wilson, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "supports the financial framework for devolution as set out by the Scottish Constitutional Convention and supported by the Scottish Labour Party and the Scottish Liberal Democrats; notes that the Barnett formula has provided a stable fiscal framework for government expenditure in Scotland; and welcomes the current record level of public expenditure in Scotland." Supported by: Peter Peacock*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1794.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-1794.1, in the name of Angus MacKay, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1794, in the name of Andrew Wilson, on the financial powers of the Scottish Parliament, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 52 | 0 | 0 | 94.5% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 67 | 50 | 0 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||