[S1M-1865.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 26 Apr 2001 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-1865.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-04-26 is:
*S1M-1865.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Hepatitis C—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1865) in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, leave out from "calls" to end and insert "notes the report produced by the Executive in October 2000 on Hepatitis C and Heat Treatment of Blood Products for Haemophiliacs in the mid 1980s; further notes the continuing deliberations of the Health and Community Care Committee on this issue and the recent ruling of the English High Court in the case of a number of NHS patients who have been infected with hepatitis C through blood transfusions, and encourages the Executive to examine constructively the implications of this ruling." Supported by: Susan Deacon*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1865.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1865.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1865, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, on hepatitis C, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 78 | 32 | 0 | 85.9% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote