[S1M-2164] Decision Time — 6 Sep 2001 at 16:20
This looks like the vote on S1M-2164
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-05 is:
*S1M-2164 Sarah Boyack: Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill be passed. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2164) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S1M-2164, in the name of Sarah Boyack, that the Erskine Bridge Toll Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 85.5% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 69.7% |
Total: | 78 | 26 | 0 | 82.5% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote