[S1M-2206.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 13 Sep 2001 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S1M-2206.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-13 is:
*S1M-2206.1 Michael Russell: Physical Chastisement of Children—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2206) in the name of Iain Gray, insert at end "but calls upon the Scottish Executive to publish full details of its proposed legislation without delay and to explain in detail to the people of Scotland why such legislation is necessary in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and to ensure that the emphasis in any such legislation is on helping parents by means of educative change rather than applying punitive sanctions. Supported by: Irene McGugan*, Colin Campbell*, Stewart Stevenson*, Brian Adam*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2206.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-2206.1, in the name of Michael Russell, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2206, in the name of Iain Gray, on the physical chastisement of children, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 89.5% |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 22 | 0 | 1 | 69.7% |
SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 104 | 0 | 1 | 82.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Christine Grahame | South of Scotland | SNP | abstention |