[S1M-2078.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Sep 2001 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-2078.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-17 is:
*S1M-2078.1 Dr Elaine Murray: Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2078) in the name of Mike Watson, leave out from "agrees" to end and insert "does not agree to the general principles of the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill because, while accepting the desire of the sponsors to end cruelty to wild mammals, it does not believe that this Bill adequately addresses the issues presented in evidence to the Rural Development Committee and considers that the Scottish Executive, as an alternative, should examine the existing law in relation to wild mammals, in particular the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996, in order to take action against any unnecessary suffering caused through the provisions of this Act and to bring the legislation covering wild mammals into line with that which applies to domestic animals."
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-19 is:
S1M-2078.1 Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill (lodged on 14 September 2001) Ben Wallace*, Mr Mike Rumbles*, Donald Gorrie*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2078.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that amendment S1M-2078.1, in the name of Dr Elaine Murray, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2078, in the name of Mike Watson, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 1 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 47 | 4 | 0 | 92.7% |
| LDem | 4 | 11 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 27 | 2 | 1 | 90.9% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 82 | 36 | 1 | 93.0% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote