[S1M-2205] Decision Time — 20 Sep 2001 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-2205
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-12 is:
*S1M-2205 Bill Aitken: Juvenile Justice—That the Parliament recognises that the Children’s Hearings system as at present constituted is manifestly failing to deal with criminal and offending behaviour and calls upon the Executive to carry out a full review of Scotland’s system of juvenile justice, such a review to include consideration of giving Children’s Hearings an increased range of disposals.
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-17 is:
S1M-2205 Bill Aitken: Juvenile Justice—That the Parliament recognises that the Children’s Hearings system as at present constituted is manifestly failing to deal with criminal and offending behaviour and calls upon the Executive to carry out a full review of Scotland’s system of juvenile justice, such a review to include consideration of giving Children’s Hearings an increased range of disposals.
You can search for this motion (S1M-2205) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S1M-2205, in the name of Bill Aitken, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 12 | 0 | 0 | 36.4% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 74 | 16 | 0 | 70.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote