Hunting with dogs: Supervision — 19 Mar 2002 at 18:50
a free "indicative" vote to guide the Government on how to deal with the issue of hunting with dogs. Those voting "content" in this division were supporting the self-regulation of hunting with dogs - in accordance with provision similar to Schedule 1 to the Hunting Bill as introduced in the Commons in Session 2000–01 [Bill 2].
Other votes covered the options of licensing scheme and a ban. The House of Commons had held its own "indicative" votes the previous day.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 97; Not-Contents, 119.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 6 | 75 (+2 tell) | 36.4% |
| Crossbench | 13 | 14 | 15.4% |
| Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 78 (+1 tell) | 2 | 40.7% |
| LDem | 18 (+1 tell) | 3 | 33.3% |
| Total: | 115 | 95 | 32.0% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.