[S1M-3149.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 May 2002 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S1M-3149.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-05-28 is:
*S1M-3149.2 Roseanna Cunningham: Alternatives to Custody-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3149) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "regrets the failure of the Scottish Executive adequately to develop a range of high quality alternatives to custody which fit the changing pattern of offending behaviour across Scotland; recognises the importance of programmes which are well-resourced and available across every jurisdiction in Scotland, and believes that a greater element of restorative justice should be introduced into the Scottish criminal justice system whether dealing with adults or young offenders."
You can search for this motion (S1M-3149.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S1M-3149.2, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3149, in the name of Jim Wallace, on alternatives to custody, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 82 | 30 | 0 | 89.6% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote